The Compulsive Splicer wrote:
>
> good-dog_at_northshore.net wrote:
>
> >Okay, maybe I misunderstand what you guys mean by this 160 X 160
> >business.
>
> It's the difference between writing out this:
>
> http://www.splicer.com/images/hwr/320x240.GIF
>
> or this:
>
> http://www.splicer.com/images/hwr/160x160.GIF
>
Dang, you 're right. Now I understand. Back to the drawing board.
I can imagine writing a little smaller, but there's a point where it's
not natural anymore. If you compare your own HWR on paper to the newt,
it seems to be pretty much the same. In writing on a smaller area you
could do the same, but you'd end up with a lot less. I've written on
small post-its and on those small pads of white paper that are
horizontally wider than a Palm device, but it's never as comfortable as
the next size up. An interesting dilemma we face with any future
device, no?
Thanks a lot for the explanation, it's been really helpful in imagining
this HWR topic we're discussing.
Mark
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:55 EST
