Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com) wrote:
> if everything is on a CD, than why the difference ?
Robert,
sampling and quantization alone ensure that there can't be everything on
a digital recording. As far as I know, the SACD uses a higher sampling
frequency and a bigger sample size, so technically it has to be better
than Red Book CDDA (not that I would hear any difference, to be sure).
Analog recordings have their own limitations, even when they are of a
different kind than the limitations of digital recordings. No recording
can capture everything, so invariably we will have to accept a compromise.
> Yes, and it will sound worse compared to the original.
> Not as bad as MP3 though.
A double-blind study conducted by the German computer magazine c't
revealed that only very young people could distinguish high-quality MP3
tracks from CD tracks, and even they couldn't say which was which. At my
age (43) it would be unwise to invest in high-end audio equipment.
- Michael
Michael J. Hussmann
E-mail: michael_at_michael-hussmann.de
WWW: http://michael-hussmann.de
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:57 EST