at the temporal coordinates: 9/6/01 12:05 PM, the entity known as System
Support Products, Inc. at sspi_at_ix.netcom.com conveyed the following:
>
> At 11:41 AM -0400 9/6/01, Eric L. Strobel wrote:
>> Again, your statement only holds IF the copyright holder chooses to protect
>> the copyright. If a copyright is held by anyone and they fail to defend
>> that copyright, then the copyright vanishes, it's as simple as that. And,
>> at that point, any talk of infringement becomes moot. At least, that's
>> always been *my* understanding of copyright.
>
> Which shows why it's not advisable to be making quasi-legal
> opinions on subjects when you're not a lawyer:
>
> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>
> See #5.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Lou Forlini
> Software Engineer
> System Support Products, Inc.
>
I would say, then, that a number of us stand humbly (or not so humbly, as
the case may be) corrected.
Of course, item #11 on that list seems to imply a sort of judicial "no harm,
no foul" principle, in which case the posting of true abandonware would seem
to entail a rather low level of legal risk.
- Eric.
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:21 EDT