on 06-09-2001 3:12, Eric L. Strobel at fyzycyst_at_home.com wrote:
> But a group ofstockholders can have influence beyond the number of shares they
> hold, if they start making noises about Apple not doing their duty to
> shareholders (by squandering a good and valuable asset, namely the Newt
> technology).
> Companies have been sued for that in the past. So a vocal group of
> stockholders is likely to be able to find a forum for their views that a
> group of customers couldn't.
Actually , the more I think about this the more it sounds like the best idea
of getting anything like a Newt back ever, even though this idea probably
has not more than a 0.001 % chance.
It would at least make a small move towards the recognition that they used
to have, once upon a time in a far away kingdom, something that was called
the Newt.
who knows...
Robert Benschop
P.S.
where and when is the next Apple shareholders meeting ?
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:23 EDT