on 4/15/02 11:22 AM, Laurent Daudelin at laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com
wrote:
> On 15/04/02 10:31, "Smith, Bradley" <bradley.smith_at_artisansw.com> wrote:
>
>> <commence language war>
>> I disagree. I know C++ _VERY_ well. I know Objective-C hardly at all but
>> it's a much better language IMHO :-)
>> </commence language war>
>
> I know both pretty well (well, I know ObjC a lot more) and I wholeheartedly
> agree. Much cleaner syntax than the convoluted C++, much more dynamic than
> the static C++ and much more flexible than the rigid C++. Plus, you can
> write all the C code you want.
Which is precisely why all the good points of ObjC will be assimilated into
Fortran 201x... :-)
(BTW, anyone remember a quote that went something like "I don't know what
language people will program with in the future, but I know it will be
called FORTRAN."???)
- Eric.
--Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)
===================================================================== Remember... Moderation in all things, INCLUDING MODERATION!! =====================================================================
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:03:45 EDT