Re: [NTLK] 2000u vs 2100

From: David Abramowitz (underdog_at_erols.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 17:35:41 EDT

Next message: Michael Mays: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Off topic - US drivers"
Previous message: Judy Perry: "Re: [NTLK] FW: Fwd: [OT] Christian fanatic Attacking Apple"
In reply to: Stephen Swift (aka Burnum): "[NTLK] 2000u vs 2100"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] 2000u vs 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The upgraded 2000 basically boosted memory and processor to equal that of
the 2100. So I'd say no, other than sport a different logo on the front...

- Dave

On 4/23/02 5:26 PM, "Stephen Swift (aka Burnum)" <burnum_at_mac.com> wrote:

>
> I checked the faq and didn't see my question...
>
> I'm buying a Newton 2100 cause I want the very best. However I've seen som=
> e
> Newton 2000 "upgraded" advertised. Is there anything a Newton 2100 can do
> that a Newton 2000 "upgraded" can't? Thanks.
>
> Stephen Swift =BF' The Burnum Man
> burnum_at_mac.com
>

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Michael Mays: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Off topic - US drivers"
Previous message: Judy Perry: "Re: [NTLK] FW: Fwd: [OT] Christian fanatic Attacking Apple"
In reply to: Stephen Swift (aka Burnum): "[NTLK] 2000u vs 2100"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] 2000u vs 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:04:51 EDT