Steve,
Do you think that Inkwell is in the Darwin layer of the OS X? If so we might be
able to do this because this layer can be looked at.
Chris
> my vote would be to skip hardware except for legacy support of existing
> units; designing/building new units would easily consume any imaginable
> fund.
>
> perhaps it's time to emulate Apple's example and move toward 'nix.
>
> port Newton core (HWR, object libraries, NewtonScript, ...) to Linux --
> - use other new hardware already out there, e.g., iPaq, Zaurus, ...
> - leverage software development tools & dev community (Java or C++, but
also
> NS if that's ported) and update to new standards (XML, SOAP, etc.)
> - focus on the integration and user experience where the Newton excelled
>
> --
> Steve
> weyer_at_kagi.com
> Newton apps/tools: Newt's Cape, newtVNC, NewtDevEnv, Sloup, Crypto,...
> http://www.kagi.com/weyer/
>
>
>
> --
> This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
> List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
>
>
>
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:01:41 EST