Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100

• Next message: John Acuff: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
• Previous message: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
• Maybe in reply to: Skip: "[NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Next in thread: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Grant Hutchinson <grant_at_splorp.com> wrote:

> That wouldn't help me identify my Newton. The front of
> the case says 'MessagePad 2100' (which it is), but the
> back of the case says 'MessagePad 2000'.

   The back or the front could have been replaced at some point in its life. I replaced the back of a 130 with a 120 back because the eject button (part of the back of the case) was broken.
   I seem to remember there was a sticker put inside Apple upgraded 2100s as well as the one by the interconnect port.
   No, I don't plan to open my upgrade and original 2100s to compare... at least not tonight.

Peter

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: John Acuff: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
• Previous message: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
• Maybe in reply to: Skip: "[NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Next in thread: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:01:50 EST