Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100

• Next message: Jeffrey M. Swiger: "Re: [NTLK] WTB: E/B Newton Glove..(2100)..."
• Previous message: Richard Harbottle: "[NTLK] IP printing?"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Next in thread: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

So it seems that the actual system ROM version and the installed patches
play a certain role in determining the amount of RAM available.
My factory 2100 (german NOS) shows in Extras / Info / Memory Info:

ROM-version D-2.1 (747129)-0
4020k installed system RAM

I will have a look this evening what my US MP 2000 will show, but it will be
definitely less.

Johannes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
> [mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net]On Behalf Of Jon Glass
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:56 PM
> To: Newtontalk
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100

> on 12/3/02 11:11 AM, Johannes Wolf at mp2100_at_mail-gw.estec.esa.nl wrote:

> > The MP2100 has 4020k of system RAM,
> > while the MP2000 has, I do not remember exactly, 1000k ?

> My factory 2100 has a mere 3523k. I must have some horrible
> fragmentation or
> something... Time for a brainwipe? :-)

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Jeffrey M. Swiger: "Re: [NTLK] WTB: E/B Newton Glove..(2100)..."
• Previous message: Richard Harbottle: "[NTLK] IP printing?"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Next in thread: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:01:52 EST