[NTLK] 2000 or 2100?

From: John Derbyshire (johnderbyshire_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 04:39:37 EST

Next message: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Previous message: Joost van de Griek: "Re: [NTLK] A little fun"
Next in thread: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Reply: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I used an OMP at work for some years in the mid90s (and still have some
stuff: 2mg flash card and software eg Learner Profile 1.1.4) and am now
planning to get either a non-upgraded 2000 or a 2100.

What do experienced users advise as to which? I like the idea of a faster
machine but I'm kind of put off the 4mg versions because of the -10061 error
problem. Should I be?

TIA

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Previous message: Joost van de Griek: "Re: [NTLK] A little fun"
Next in thread: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Reply: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 or 2100?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:03:01 EST