Re: [NTLK] Dictionary?

From: Laurent Daudelin (nemesys_at_cox.rr.com)
Date: Sun Feb 03 2002 - 22:46:17 EST


on 03/02/02 03:06, Chris Chapman at pan1k_at_earthlink.net wrote:

> On 2/2/02 11:59 PM, "Robert Benschop" <rbenschop_at_mac.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> on 03-02-2002 2:28, Victor Rehorst at victor_at_newtontalk.net wrote:
>>
>>> ANd there's also WordNewt, which apparently has more features than
>>> Lexionary, but its database files are also much larger. It's sitting in
>>> the UNNA submission queue right now:
>>>
>>> http://guelph.unna.org/incoming/
>>
>> Eh, it isn't and it isn't in the applications directory either, the mystery
>> of the missing package ?
>>
>>
>> Robert Benschop
>> I belive I saw wordnewt in the submissions directory this morning.
>
> -Chris

Yes, Chris? Or is it another post from NeXTMail? ;-D

-Laurent.

-- 
=====================================================================
Laurent Daudelin            <http://home.cox.rr.com/nemesys>
Logiciels Nemesys Software         mailto:nemesys_at_cox.rr.com

evil and rude adj.: Both evil and rude, but with the additional connotation that the rudeness was due to malice rather than incompetence. Thus, for example: Microsoft's Windows NT is evil because it's a competent implementation of a bad design; it's rude because it's gratuitously incompatible with Unix in places where compatibility would have been as easy and effective to do; but it's evil and rude because the incompatibilities are apparently there not to fix design bugs in Unix but rather to lock hapless customers and developers into the Microsoft way. Hackish evil and rude is close to the mainstream sense of `evil'.

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:01:59 EST