Since serial is so much slower, and has been known to be less reliable than
ethernet (Appletalk or no) And considering that most of the machines that
can run OSX don't have serial ports. (without the aid of adapters). I still
don't see how connecting to OSX would be worse off with ethernet than
serial. Why is Appletalk not ideal? (I'm not suggesting it is, I'm just
asking why you think it isn't) I don't know if you are aware of this but
there is a TCP/IP Dock transport by Thomas Tempelmann and Jim Anderson
(http://www.tempel.org/newton/) so you don't have to use Appletalk.
Rui
Ben McBeen wrote:
> And by using ethernet you connect to... classic. And across Appletalk no
> less. These are not ideal solutions either.
>
> Serial is a good place to start, but I plan to do more.
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Rui Curveira wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry if this question is missing something that is obvious but ... why
> > don't
> > you use an ethernet connection instead of trying to get everything to
> > work
> > through serial adapters etc.
> >
> > Rui
> >
> >
>
> --
> This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
> To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
> mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:03:21 EST