Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge.

From: Woo Lee (vitcitylb_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 16:18:26 EST

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] eMate Problem"
Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Reply: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yup, my 215-Mhz AMP21K is fun to use again. At 162-Mhz it was slow
responding, that's why I have 5 AMP21K's and use 3 all day. ;-)
------------------
>The people that have the Pixsolution accelerator in their Newts don't seem
>to mind either ;-) and somewhere in the future we will probably find out
>that the Newt will be too slow for something we'll crave :-(
>
>
>Robert Benschop
------------------

---------------------
!ooW %-)
Pres. of Los Angeles Newton Users Group!

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] eMate Problem"
Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Reply: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] CPU speed (was Bigge."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:18 EST