On 11/01/02 12:26, "Samuel Jacobson" <jacobson98_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
> I took a look for past messages on the subject but did not find the
> answer to my query (as well as I did not see anything in the FAQ). I have
> tried to download the DragonSpeak demo off of UNNA and I cannot seem to get
> it to work on my uMP2000 as I always get right to the end of the download
> and then get an error stating that the package will not work on the system.
> Since other appear to have gotten then program to work I was wondering what
> needs to be done? Also I only have the original microphone in the unit, yet
> I seem to recall someone saying there was a patch that will allow the
> program to use the original MP design. Is this correct?
Samuel,
I'm a bit confused about which transfer you're talking about. Is this the
one where you transfer the file from UNNA to your computer, or the one where
you transfer the package from your computer onto your UMP2K? If it's the
former, I fail to see why it would tell you that the package will not work
on the system, or I don't understand the meaning of this message...
To answer your 2nd question, yes, there is a "hack" that will let you use
your internal microphone as the Dragon Demo input source. The author is
Daniel Padilla and he usually reads this mailing list.
-Laurent.
-- ===================================================================== Laurent Daudelin Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com Washington, DC, USA ********************** Usual disclaimers apply ********************** candygrammar n.: A programming-language grammar that is mostly syntactic sugar; the term is also a play on `candygram'. COBOL, Apple's Hypertalk language, and a lot of the so-called `4GL' database languages share this property. The usual intent of such designs is that they be as English-like as possible, on the theory that they will then be easier for unskilled people to program. This intention comes to grief on the reality that syntax isn't what makes programming hard; it's the mental effort and organization required to specify an algorithm precisely that costs. Thus the invariable result is that `candygrammar' languages are just as difficult to program in as terser ones, and far more painful for the experienced hacker.-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:22 EST