Re: [NTLK] typeit4me

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 06:25:56 EST

Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] 10061 patches and emate"
Previous message: Christian Matzerath: "Re: [NTLK] typeit4me"
In reply to: Christian Matzerath: "Re: [NTLK] typeit4me"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 15-01-2002 11:47, Christian Matzerath at matze_at_uumail.de wrote:

> So you're lucky, Robert, and by the way, it is not that I couldn't write
> Stadtverwaltungsformularbogen properly, but "svfb" as a glossary-shortcut
> would be a bit shorter, wouldn't it?

I start to wonder more and more why alt..rec is giving problems with you
guys, maybe a Paul can chime in, like is there a known package that alt.rec
has a conflict with ?
And yes, I agree that svfb is a bit faster to write ;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] 10061 patches and emate"
Previous message: Christian Matzerath: "Re: [NTLK] typeit4me"
In reply to: Christian Matzerath: "Re: [NTLK] typeit4me"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:34 EST