Re: [NTLK] Re - Capacity

From: Andrew Beals (bandy_at_cinnamon.com)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 20:26:48 EST

Next message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] Emate NOS 2.2"
Previous message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Battery tray"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - Capacity"
Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Re - Capacity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:57:44 +0100, Frank_Gruendel_at_t-online.de (Frank
Gruendel) wrote:
>
> > OK Frank...what happened to your capacity to resist?
>
> Not sure. So far it has steadfastly resisted to induce proof
> of existence.

Wire you missing the point, Frank? Is it because you're a foreigner, far away
from our ohm? Mho reasons I can't fathom right now - I'll save the
speculation Faraday.

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] Emate NOS 2.2"
Previous message: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Battery tray"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] Re - Capacity"
Next in thread: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Re - Capacity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:03:01 EST