Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan

From: Ken Whitcomb (ken_at_imageguild.com)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 18:38:17 EST

Next message: Darl Singh: "[NTLK] Apple (well - WOZ) handheld?"
Previous message: David L. Duff: "[NTLK] Clear MP 110 or is it re-cased gray 1X0?"
In reply to: Fred Buecker: "Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan"
Next in thread: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hmm, Fred, I think you're referring to the NetWave and Daynacom Roamer
products. At least the speed is the same as well as the protocol (localtalk)

Ken

> Then I'm thinking of the WaveLAN technology, maybe Lucent did that as a
> marketing scheme, but WaveLAN as I know it is an older wireless
> technology that topped out at about 2Mbs. To be honest, I never looked
> at Lucent cards, I don't know why, but I've never even shopped for them.
> My whole thing is, I was afraid that if someone put the effort into
> WaveLAN (As I know it) drivers, it would turn out to be a wasted effort.
> People are deveoping Newt drivers and get little or no money in return,
> I'd hate to see someone get frustrated because they made a product that
> would get pushed aside.
>
> Fred

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Darl Singh: "[NTLK] Apple (well - WOZ) handheld?"
Previous message: David L. Duff: "[NTLK] Clear MP 110 or is it re-cased gray 1X0?"
In reply to: Fred Buecker: "Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan"
Next in thread: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:03:31 EST