OK, I feel like a complete ass. I did some digging and what was stuck in
my head was RANGE-LAN. I'm sorry.
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael J. Hu=DFmann [mailto:michael_at_michael-hussmann.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:40 PM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Groupers were based on Wavelan
Fred Buecker (tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net) wrote:
> Then I'm thinking of the WaveLAN technology, maybe Lucent did that as
a
> marketing scheme, but WaveLAN as I know it is an older wireless
> technology that topped out at about 2Mbs.
Lucent's WaveLAN card have always been based on the 802.11 standard. The
first versions of these cards supported just 2 Mbs while later 802.11b
versions supported 11 Mbs. As a matter of fact, Apple's AirPort cards
were developed by Lucent and are based on WaveLAN technology.
Interoperability between older 2 Mbs (by Lucent, Farallon, or others)
and
newer 11 Mbs cards is no problem at all; 11 Mbs cards will fall back to
2
Mbs anyway if the signal strength is too low to support 11 Mbs.
- Michael
Michael J. Hussmann
E-mail: michael_at_michael-hussmann.de
WWW: http://michael-hussmann.de
--=20
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=3Dunsubscribe
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:03:32 EST