Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 09:44:32 EDT

Next message: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Previous message: eschneck_at_mindspring.com: "Re: [NTLK] IRDA and IrTalk????"
In reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Next in thread: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 06-06-2002 3:29, Rolf Brakvatne at rbrak29_at_qwest.net wrote:

> The OS aside

Not to mention the fact that they don't even mention battery life on the
site, just 'Advanced lithium polymer battery', yeah, great...

Hold on to your Newts ;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Previous message: eschneck_at_mindspring.com: "Re: [NTLK] IRDA and IrTalk????"
In reply to: Rolf Brakvatne: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Next in thread: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:01:48 EDT