[NTLK] OT: NT Tab completion (was Re:The OQO should have been6

• Next message: SuerthP_at_andersonnews.com: "[NTLK] WaveLAN Driver 1.0"
• Previous message: Stephen Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] Convincing argument against MS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

as a developer of palm s/w for accessing data from an AS/400 where that
data is congealed on a W2k or NT server then synchronized to the hh, yes 9
out of 10 is fabulous! hehehe...
(just convinced the boss to buy a new iMac one month after he bought a
newton....)

orig msg below...

From: richard_at_cyberphotographer.com
Subject: Re: [NTLK] OT: NT Tab completion (was Re:The OQO should have been

> >Very little that you do in the Reg is gonna completely disable
>your OS install...9 times
>out of 10 you're gonna be just fine.

This was a joke, right? Or do windos users think 9 times out of 10 is
pretty reliable?

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

• Next message: SuerthP_at_andersonnews.com: "[NTLK] WaveLAN Driver 1.0"
• Previous message: Stephen Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] Convincing argument against MS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:02:02 EDT