On this topic, all I can say is that there're about 20 serial codes
'floating around' for Newton applications if you know where to look.
Not a lot, and the applications don't look particularly great, but they
are out there.
-----Original Message-----
From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
[mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net] On Behalf Of Christopher
Frazier
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:05 PM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Abandonware (from New 2100 on eBay)
Eric - thanks so much! I was about to check the archives and figured if
I could get a concise opinion on it from the community in one e-mail,
I'd be better off. The whole "it's still copyrighted" thing pretty much
sums up how I understand things. Just makes me thankful for the people
that have kept things up here for newbies like myself.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
[mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net] On Behalf Of Eric L. Strobel
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:59 AM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Abandonware (from New 2100 on eBay)
on 6/27/02 11:42 AM, Christopher Frazier at cfrazier_at_webplantation.com
wrote:
>
>
>> Can it still be registered? I seem to recall someone posting here a
>> few months ago that they wanted to pay for it but couldn't
> anymore.
>
> That's something I've been wondering about here... What's the deal
> with abandonware? I've been popping around on UNNA and have noticed
> that a number of the packages that I've wanted to use were published
> by organizations that aren't around. Maybe those packages aren't
> worth using, but it made me ask myself what the community is doing
> about good software that's no longer legitimately available. What's
> the general concensus?
>
> Chris
>
Oh, Good Heavens!! Not the 'abandonware thread' again??!? :-)
To summarize quickly, and hopefully without bias, there are two basic
schools of thought (with variations on these). One is that, regardless
of the abandonment, the software is still covered under somebody's
copyright and so cracking it and/or distributing keys for it constitutes
piracy. The other view is to make a heroic effort to contact the
copyright holder and obtain permission to distribute (and perhaps obtain
source code for further development), but, failing that, go ahead and
make the package available. In this second view, the way I seem to
remember it being refined, an escrow account would be set up to collect
any applicable shareware fees. If the author later turns up, they'd get
paid. If not, then some procedure would have to be established to
dispose of that money in a proper fashion.
I'm sure if I over/under/mis-stated anything, there are plenty who will
correct me on this. Also, you can check the list archives... You
should have no problem finding a number of threads on this general
topic!
- Eric.
--Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)
===================================================================== Bioweapons? HA! I laugh at them!! *I've* cleaned the coffee urns at work!!!! =====================================================================
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:03:03 EDT