Re: [NTLK] WaveLAN card and Airport sucks batteries

From: Ben McBeen (info_at_mcbeen.com)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 02:12:05 EST

Next message: Ben McBeen: "Re: [NTLK] Power Consumtion of WaveLAN card"
Previous message: Jim Witte: "[NTLK] 3AM Stroll solution.. Almost.."
In reply to: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] WaveLAN card and Airport sucks batteries"
Next in thread: andrew_at_misf67.cern.ch: "Re: [NTLK] WaveLAN card and Airport sucks batteries"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You are forgetting that these cards transmit up to 1 watt of power. The
juice needs to come from somewhere.

On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 04:14 AM, Marco Mailand wrote:

> This is really disappointing. I would state that the designer of this
> card
> hasn't kept in mind that a portable runs on batteries/accus.

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Ben McBeen: "Re: [NTLK] Power Consumtion of WaveLAN card"
Previous message: Jim Witte: "[NTLK] 3AM Stroll solution.. Almost.."
In reply to: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] WaveLAN card and Airport sucks batteries"
Next in thread: andrew_at_misf67.cern.ch: "Re: [NTLK] WaveLAN card and Airport sucks batteries"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:56 EST