Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID

• Next message: Seth Hurwitz: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Previous message: Larrie Easterly: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• In reply to: Rodney George: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Next in thread: SuerthP_at_andersonnews.com: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rodney,

Most dial out only numbers usually show as 'Unknown' on the caller id. I did
a reverse phone number lookup using http://www.reversephonedirectory.com/
and it came up blank. It is just an interesting little side note in my life.

Larrie

> From: Rodney George <res09nlq_at_verizon.net>
> Reply-To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:39:18 -0500
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID
>
> I could be a dial out only number.
>
> Rodney
>
> Larrie Easterly wrote:
>>
>> Can caller ID's be spoofed?
>>
>> Missed a call on my cell phone today. The messaging system showed a number.
>> When I tried calling it the computer operator said "You have reached a
>> number is no longer in service or has been disconnected". Go figure.
>>

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

• Next message: Seth Hurwitz: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Previous message: Larrie Easterly: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• In reply to: Rodney George: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Next in thread: SuerthP_at_andersonnews.com: "Re: [NTLK] OT - Caller ID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jun 12 2002 - 20:02:12 EDT