Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?

• Next message: Randy & Cheyanne: "Re: [NTLK] Canon portable printer & emate"
• Previous message: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] New mail rule"
• In reply to: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Next in thread: Charles Isaac: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I have a OMP that I bought when they first came out. I also have a 110 and
120 and I never had too much trouble with the handwriting, but I tend to
print everything... My background is Architecturer and you get so used to
printing and being consistant that it makes that side of things much easier.
It did take some time for it to learn but worked fine. My 2100 on the
otherhand is much better right out of the box.

Larry Zasitko

> [mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net]On Behalf Of James Elliott
> Sent: November 15, 2002 11:20 PM

> Subject: Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?

> Have you ever used an OMP? I get perfect results with NOS 2.0 and
> 2.1, but 1.1 and 1.3 don't work very well for me. Most people I know
> can't get anything with 1.x.
>
> -James

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Randy & Cheyanne: "Re: [NTLK] Canon portable printer & emate"
• Previous message: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] New mail rule"
• In reply to: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Next in thread: Charles Isaac: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:02:59 EST