Re: [NTLK] good email client for 040 mac

• Next message: b e n w e l l s|headwerkx: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Previous message: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Maybe in reply to: Anton Balaban: "Re: [NTLK] good email client for 040 mac"
• Next in thread: Technoir Support: "Re: [NTLK] good email client for 040 mac"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a previous message, Technoir Support typed vigorously:

>right. i have that patch, the trouble is it requires Emailer 2.0v3. i have =
>v1 and it is the v3 update that fails =3D[. so if there is a download for =
>a full v3 version i'm listening...

I run Emailer 2.0v3 under Mac OS 9.2.2 without any Y2K scripts or
patches. What on this big blue marble are you folks talking about?

g.

......................................................................

Grant Hutchinson Interface Considerations & Toys

Live video served fresh since 1996. http://www.splorp.com/cam/
Now fortified with daily ramblings. http://www.splorp.com/blog/
Newton. It's the Palm with a brain. http://www.splorp.com/newton/
Online community web site handyman. http://www.newted.net/

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: b e n w e l l s|headwerkx: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Previous message: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] Why did the Newton fail?"
• Maybe in reply to: Anton Balaban: "Re: [NTLK] good email client for 040 mac"
• Next in thread: Technoir Support: "Re: [NTLK] good email client for 040 mac"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:03:03 EST