Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising...

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Fri Nov 29 2002 - 14:08:36 EST

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] OT: PalmOS-based AlphaSmart Dana"
Previous message: Helvecio Mafra: "Re: [NTLK] Why emails and not Forums?"
In reply to: Ben Wells: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Next in thread: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Reply: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 29-11-2002 4:12, Ben Wells at headwerkx_at_iprimus.com.au wrote:

>> Actually, I found it to be quite inspired. It certainly gets your
>> attention! In a VERY crowded marketplace, that can be the hardest
>> part.
> Maybe, but verbal masturbation is still verbal masturbation...

True, but how much attention would public masturbation on eBay generate?

;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] OT: PalmOS-based AlphaSmart Dana"
Previous message: Helvecio Mafra: "Re: [NTLK] Why emails and not Forums?"
In reply to: Ben Wells: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Next in thread: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Reply: David Orriss Jr: "Re: [NTLK] GEM's advertising..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:03:52 EST