Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU

• Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] hypercard address stack to names"
• Previous message: Daniel Jagendorf: "[NTLK] NYCnug"
• In reply to: Michael Blazer: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Next in thread: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Reply: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Reply: Woody: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 10/1/02 7:12 AM, Michael Blazer at m.blazer_at_utoronto.ca wrote:

> You should be able to run up to system 7.5.5 (maybe even 7.6, not sure) on
> your LCII. And LCII has a 68030, which I think meets NCU's minimum
> requirements.

I thought the LCII ran a 68020 processor? (Or was that the LC?) My parents
have both, and I can't remember which had which...

-- 
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<jonglass_at_usa.net>
<glasshaus5_at_aol.com>
"You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the
very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for
independence." -- C. A. Beard
-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

• Next message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] hypercard address stack to names"
• Previous message: Daniel Jagendorf: "[NTLK] NYCnug"
• In reply to: Michael Blazer: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Next in thread: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Reply: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Reply: Woody: "Re: [NTLK] system 6 + NCU"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:01:56 EST