Re: [NTLK] Did anyone else get this?

From: Glen Warner (gdwarner_at_mindspring.com)
Date: Sun Oct 13 2002 - 07:29:53 EDT

Next message: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] [INFO] Recent E-Mail Viruses"
Previous message: John Skinner: "[NTLK] NewtStumbler?"
Maybe in reply to: Darren De Silva: "[NTLK] Did anyone else get this?"
Next in thread: Sunder: "[NTLK] [OT] Single pixel spies and scumware (was Re:Did anyone else get this?)"
Reply: Sunder: "[NTLK] [OT] Single pixel spies and scumware (was Re:Did anyone else get this?)"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Did anyone else get this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Eric L. Strobel" <fyzycyst_at_comcast.net> wrote:

(*snip*)

> Personally, I disable that just so those annoying single pixel
graphics
> that act as 'spys' don't have a chance.

Hmm ... what's this? Could you elaborate a bit ...?

--gdw

> - Eric.

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] [INFO] Recent E-Mail Viruses"
Previous message: John Skinner: "[NTLK] NewtStumbler?"
Maybe in reply to: Darren De Silva: "[NTLK] Did anyone else get this?"
Next in thread: Sunder: "[NTLK] [OT] Single pixel spies and scumware (was Re:Did anyone else get this?)"
Reply: Sunder: "[NTLK] [OT] Single pixel spies and scumware (was Re:Did anyone else get this?)"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Did anyone else get this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:02:39 EST