I don't know about Apple, but I know that anything I create on a company
machine is company property. And that's that! I can't imagine that Apple,
strict as it is, would be any different.
Dave
On 10/12/02 12:54 PM, "Norman Palardy" <palardyn_at_shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> Are you sure about this ?
>
> I've had contracts like that initially read like this. On closer
> examination by my lawyer they all are set in terms of things that I
> create while working on projects and duties for them are theirs, but
> not things I create say for another client who I'm also under contract
> to at the time. Of course if either side wanted to litigate it would be
> messy and open to the interpretation of the courts, but here there's a
> precedent that this interpretation is in fact correct.
>
> Probably worth having your lawyer look over it and see if that's not
> indeed the case
>
> On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 10:27 AM, John Anderson wrote:
>
>
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:02:39 EST