Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?

From: Glen Warner (gdwarner_at_mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 00:12:01 EST

Next message: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "[NTLK] [WeeklyANN] Got a question?"
Maybe in reply to: Varun Mehta: "[NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Next in thread: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

(*snip*)

> Have the coverless ones actually usually had Ok screens?

My screen was fine. It was dusty to be sure (and it had a few
fingerrints on it), but a little cleanup, and it was just fine.

--gdw

> Brian

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "[NTLK] [WeeklyANN] Got a question?"
Maybe in reply to: Varun Mehta: "[NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Next in thread: Glen Warner: "Re: [NTLK] Cheap 2100's, too good to be true?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:04:41 EST