Re: [NTLK] Bugtrap report: eMate 2.2 & Wavelan card

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Thu Oct 31 2002 - 01:34:40 EST

Next message: KC Bug: "[NTLK] Newton users are the best."
Previous message: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] Importing RTF file to NewtonWorks"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Bugtrap report: eMate 2.2 & Wavelan card"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>There is one interesting question, though. Is there anything *newer* in the
>eMate 2.2 OS than there is in the patched 2.1?

The patched eMate saying 2.1 is newer than the unpatched eMate saying 2.2.
Stephanie has an interesting and convincing theory about 2.2.
http://www.felesmagus.com/newton/otheremate.html

However, I wouldn't suggest not patching one's eMate. I understand
the fascination about 2.2, though.

Paul

-- NPDS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/ Apache: http://www.kallisys.com/

-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: KC Bug: "[NTLK] Newton users are the best."
Previous message: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] Importing RTF file to NewtonWorks"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Bugtrap report: eMate 2.2 & Wavelan card"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:04:47 EST