Re: [NTLK] I've always wanted a Newton....

From: Daniel Padilla (daniel.padilla_at_wanadoo.es)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 12:53:29 PDT

• Next message: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Travel and the Newt"
• Previous message: Rolf Brakvatne: "Re: [NTLK] Travel and the Newt"
• In reply to: J. E. Simons: "Re: [NTLK] I've always wanted a Newton...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

    I've never heard such thing. Both have a way to check the internal
temperature.

    Did you read it somewhere? Or saw any different component in the PCBs?

Daniel Padilla

>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Correct...there is no functional difference whatsoever between an
> upgrade 2000 and a 2100. In fact when Apple did the upgrade the even
> put a 2100 sticker on the device.
>
> Ken Schoenberg
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> actually, there IS a functional difference between the 2K and the 2100..
>
> the 2Ks have an internal thermometer, where the 2100s do not..
>

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

• Next message: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Travel and the Newt"
• Previous message: Rolf Brakvatne: "Re: [NTLK] Travel and the Newt"
• In reply to: J. E. Simons: "Re: [NTLK] I've always wanted a Newton...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 12:59:19 PDT