Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?

From: Rich Lindsay (rich_at_thisoldnewt.net)
Date: Thu Sep 05 2002 - 04:48:15 PDT

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] Just got my newton today..."
Previous message: Rich Lindsay: "Re: [NTLK] New 120 owner with a problem..."
In reply to: Marty Sanchez: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Next in thread: James Witte: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Reply: James Witte: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Make ure there are no extra pace in the owner name. ometime thi will=20
kill you. The owner name need to be exact.

On Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 02:18 AM, Marty Sanchez wrote:

> Their applications are owner name dependent.
>
Keep the Green=99
Rich
This Old Newt, For all your newton needs
http://www.thisoldnewt.net

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] Just got my newton today..."
Previous message: Rich Lindsay: "Re: [NTLK] New 120 owner with a problem..."
In reply to: Marty Sanchez: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Next in thread: James Witte: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Reply: James Witte: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 12:59:20 PDT