[NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100

From: Siegelrj_at_aol.com
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 17:19:06 PDT

• Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Previous message: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] [announce] TON UPDATE"
• Next in thread: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Reply: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Maybe reply: Siegelrj_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi all--
What is the REAL difference between the MP 2000 and the MP2100 and between an
upgraded and original 2100? As near as I can tell, the specs for the 2000
and 2100 are identical except the 2100 has more memory. I have an MP2000
upgraded to 2100 and an "original" 2100. Both function very well except my
original 2100 works a bit better; it's a little faster on the uptake.

Ads on ebay talk about an "original 2100" as if it was somehow superior.
What's the real story on this?

Thanks,
Rene

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

• Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Previous message: Patrick Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] [announce] TON UPDATE"
• Next in thread: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Reply: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Maybe reply: Siegelrj_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] MP2100 UPGRADE VS MP 2100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 12:59:20 PDT