Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u

From: ZUMWALT, DANNY P (SWBT) (dz1317_at_sbc.com)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 02:40:38 PDT

Next message: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Previous message: Scott Roy Atwood: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Maybe in reply to: ZUMWALT, DANNY P (SWBT): "[NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Next in thread: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Reply: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Reply: Rich Lindsay: "[NTLK] Newtscape Re: madmax on newton 2000u"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

so, sounds like newtscape is a better browser then, is there any reason i
should delete nethopper and run newtscape solely?

thanks

> NetHopper is an HTTP 1.0 client and doesn't understand virtual hosts.
> Try Newt's Cape instead. It supports HTTP 1.1 and virtual hosts.
>
> -Scott
>

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Previous message: Scott Roy Atwood: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Maybe in reply to: ZUMWALT, DANNY P (SWBT): "[NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Next in thread: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Reply: Simon Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] madmax on newton 2000u"
Reply: Rich Lindsay: "[NTLK] Newtscape Re: madmax on newton 2000u"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 12:59:23 PDT