Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:19:51 PDT

• Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
• Previous message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
• In reply to: Chris Lang: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On woensdag, apr 30, 2003, at 18:34 Europe/Amsterdam, Chris Lang wrote:
>> And wasn't there some kind of stipulation with the lawsuit Apple
>> Records filed with Apple Computers that dealt with Apple doing
>> something with music? I wonder how this latest foray of Apple
>> computer will affect that?
> It was settled with Apple Records along time ago!

I think this was settled in the days Apple added the Synth to Quicktime

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
• Previous message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
• In reply to: Chris Lang: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!-still *just* a digital walkman"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:30:01 PDT