Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:05:24 PDT

Next message: David Mills: "[NTLK] Escale"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
In reply to: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 11:44 AM, E. Male wrote:

> AHHH, so 128 kBps AAC encoding sounds as good or better than that at
> mp3?
> Maybe my comment was premature...I stand (if necessary) corrected.

That is the current apple hype, although I will leave it our ears to
actually test this...

Also Slashdot has a link to a spectrum analyses comparison... Which is
too busy to see at the moment.

Marty

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: David Mills: "[NTLK] Escale"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
In reply to: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: E. Male: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 13:00:01 PDT