Re: [NTLK] Another idea for packages...

From: Glen Warner (gdwarner_at_mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Aug 26 2003 - 13:39:43 PDT

• Next message: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] Erasing system patches on 2x00"
• Previous message: Dean Wendt: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001"
• Maybe in reply to: Brandon Meyer: "[NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Matt Janeczek" <MJJ14_at_aol.com> wrote:
 
> Haha, I wonder if we took a poll, how many subscribers to this list
are
> either engineers or scientists of some sort. :-)

Former Navy electronics technician, former software and aviation
technical writer, now court reporting student ....! :o\

--gdw

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] Erasing system patches on 2x00"
• Previous message: Dean Wendt: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001"
• Maybe in reply to: Brandon Meyer: "[NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Another idea for packages..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 27 2003 - 10:30:01 PDT