Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?

From: Peter H. Coffin (hellsop_at_ninehells.com)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 12:56:17 PST

Next message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Previous message: Lorin Rivers: "[NTLK] What does a hard reset followed by a restore leave out?"
In reply to: Stocker, Michael: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Next in thread: Paul Braun: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:12:38PM -0500, Stocker, Michael wrote:
> So, this is not a serial port, but a Newton specific I/O port?

Right. It's a mulitfunction comms port with a readily-availible serial
dongle for it.

-- 
59. I will never build a sentient computer smarter than I am.
                --Peter Anspach's list of things to do as an Evil Overlord
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Previous message: Lorin Rivers: "[NTLK] What does a hard reset followed by a restore leave out?"
In reply to: Stocker, Michael: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Next in thread: Paul Braun: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 03 2003 - 13:30:00 PST