Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?

From: Brian Braunschweiger (brianbraun_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 07:05:38 PST

Next message: Mark Ezell: "[NTLK] RPN Scientific Graphing Calculator"
Previous message: Andrew Thiel: "Re: [NTLK] WinNTK to MacNTK conversion: what's the public?"
In reply to: Paul Braun: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:14 PM -0600 2/3/2003, Paul Braun wrote:
>I believe that the original game plan called for a number of different
>dongles for different connectivity, all using the one port. However,
>things in Newtonland started to go South, and the serial dongle
>was all that was produced.

Makes sense. thanks.

Brian

-- 
Brian Braunschweiger
"Anyone can devise a plan by which good people may go to heaven. Only God
can devise a plan whereby sinners, who are his enemies, can go to heaven."
                                 -  L.S. Chafer
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Mark Ezell: "[NTLK] RPN Scientific Graphing Calculator"
Previous message: Andrew Thiel: "Re: [NTLK] WinNTK to MacNTK conversion: what's the public?"
In reply to: Paul Braun: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Why did Apple use a serial dongle?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 08:30:00 PST