One thing to keep in mind about all of this is that Strunk is nearly=20
100 years old at this point (despite White's revision of him, he added=20=
remarkably little to the meat of the thing=97aside from the brilliant=20
introductory essay on Strunk). English, like all languages, changes=20
over time, and it appears that the possessive apostrophe rule is going=20=
to be the next big element of the language to change. The fact that=20
this discussion keeps popping up from time to time EVERYWHERE is a=20
pretty good indication that the rule is changing.
The comma will be next. Split infinitives officially went a few years=20=
ago (an incredibly silly rule that as I understand exists only because=20=
it is impossible to split an infinitive in Latin). All this, and we=20
only got the letter "K" sorted out a few hundred years ago!
Cheers
Scott
>
> In a previous message, Tom McDougal typed vigorously:
>
>> This came up in a recent discussion with friends. We disagreed about=20=
>> the
>> rule so we went to two authorities: Elements of Style (Strunk &=20
>> White) and
>> A Dictionary of Modern American Usage (Garner). The authorities=20
>> agreed:
>> Form the singular possessive by adding apostrophe-S no matter what =
the
>> last character is.=
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 04:02:56 EST