Re: [NTLK] ATA works in 2100, not in 130

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Tue Jan 21 2003 - 16:10:53 EST

Next message: Robert Benschop: "[NTLK] Whooeee?"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Ata memory question !"
In reply to: Donald Wilson: "[NTLK] ATA works in 2100, not in 130"
Next in thread: William Eggington: "[NTLK] Too much power?"
Reply: William Eggington: "[NTLK] Too much power?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

À (At) 12:54 -0500 17/01/03, Donald Wilson écrivait (wrote) :
>Using RC4, I cannot initialize an ATA card in my 130, nor use one
>formatted in a 2100.
>
>This did not used to be the case. Anyone else had similar problems?
>This a new bug?

This might be a bug.
MP130 and MP2100 are handled differently by ATA Support because they
have two different chips to access PCMCIA cards. Cf my private mail.

Paul

-- NPDS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/ Apache: http://www.kallisys.com/

-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "[NTLK] Whooeee?"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Ata memory question !"
In reply to: Donald Wilson: "[NTLK] ATA works in 2100, not in 130"
Next in thread: William Eggington: "[NTLK] Too much power?"
Reply: William Eggington: "[NTLK] Too much power?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 04:03:44 EST