Re: [NTLK] NewtSync -- Oh! Oh! -- Pkg? Sheez!

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 14:03:47 PST

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Old 2100 user !"
Previous message: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] so we have a Dock port... now what?"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] NewtSync -- Oh! Oh! -- Pkg? Sheez!"
Next in thread: Norman Palardy: "Re: [NTLK] NewtSync -- Oh! Oh! -- Pkg? Sheez!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

À (At) 22:37 +0100 28/01/03, Robert Benschop écrivait (wrote) :
> > Did I mention there is now a IANA-approved port for Newton Dock protocol?
>> It's 3679.
>
>How come, did you file a formal request Paul?

Yes.
I needed a port for some cool project where IANA registration is
required (this probably replies Donald's question as well). I
registered NPDS tracker port as well.

Paul

-- 
NPDS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/
Apache: http://www.kallisys.com/
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Old 2100 user !"
Previous message: Grant Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] so we have a Dock port... now what?"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] NewtSync -- Oh! Oh! -- Pkg? Sheez!"
Next in thread: Norman Palardy: "Re: [NTLK] NewtSync -- Oh! Oh! -- Pkg? Sheez!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 29 2003 - 16:30:03 PST