From: David Orriss Jr (dave_at_davenet.net)
Date: Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:28:42 PST
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:40:21AM +0100, Paul Guyot wrote:
>
> 220 is probably too high, I mean that it probably slows down the
> Newton more than accelerating it because that memory is stolen from
> the Newton's package cache (like any large chunk of memory you would
> allocate from C++).
>
Which reminds me, Paul. I had a question for you... ;)
I have a 128MB ATA card divided up into 4/32MB stores. What should my
cache values be for best throughput? I think I currently have them
set to 140 or something like that...
TIA.
-- David Orriss Jr. -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:16:58 PST