From: Richard G. DAVIS (msys1_at_charter.net)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:47:30 PST
I have used my 2100 for so long and only with cursive writing that I don't
remember how I got it to the point that it rarely misses my writing. I now
instinctively write my cursive in 'newton' style all the time... :-)
All I can say is that it does a fine job with my handwriting.
Regards,
Richard.
-- Richard G. Davis 209 Edgebrook Drive Boylston, MA 01505 > From: David-Michael Cook <bluefusion_at_mac.com> > Reply-To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:24:19 -0500 > To: Newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net > Subject: [NTLK] Improving Cursive recognizer? > > I have great luck with the printed recognizer on the Newton, but just > recently became aware of the fact that it does not "learn", and > apparently the Cursive recognizer does. Now, the Print recognizer is > certainly good, but it misses some common things, presumably because I > can't "teach" it. > > So I'm trying the Cursive recognizer, and for some reason I'm really > not having good luck with it--no matter what settings I use, it isn't > really anything like what I'm writing half the time. What are some tips > for improving its recognition? I want to see its "learning" in action, > and at the moment it's slightly better than it started out as (about > six hours of writing so far over a few days, but it still has around a > 70% accuracy or less, whereas the print recognizer gets a good > 85-90%...) > > So does anyone know the secret to getting Newton to recognize better? > How to write, etc.? Thanks! -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:30:00 PST