Re: [NTLK] OT iPod mutates - and a question

From: Nathan Turnage (nturnage_at_andadv.com)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 07:27:34 PDT

Next message: 2impact_at_msn.com: "[NTLK] Newton 200/2100"
Previous message: Rich Oliver: "[NTLK] Names Person to Company"
In reply to: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] OT iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] OT iPod mutates - and a question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Is it me or am I the only one who - when listening to even a high bitrate
> MP3 on a very good stereo system - thinks the sound quality is DRECK
> compared to the original vinyl or CD?

I agree. That is why I bought a copy of Pink Floyd's Division Bell on
vinyl. The sound is sublime. So much better than CD or MP3.

-N

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: 2impact_at_msn.com: "[NTLK] Newton 200/2100"
Previous message: Rich Oliver: "[NTLK] Names Person to Company"
In reply to: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] OT iPod mutates - and a question"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] OT iPod mutates - and a question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 06 2003 - 04:43:56 PDT