Re: [NTLK] [?] OT or not OT, that's the question.

From: Karel Jansens (kareljansens_at_tiscalinet.be)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 02:51:16 PDT

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Fieldworker"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "[NTLK] soldering new RAM (MP2kU)"
In reply to: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] "Newton" Talk - what a novel idea!"
Next in thread: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] [?] OT or not OT, that's the question."
Reply: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] [?] OT or not OT, that's the question."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wednesday 07 May 2003 21:02, Chip Matteson wrote:
> Nope.
> OT should be welcome and flame retardant as long as it is labeled as
> such. A friendly and open list, like the Newt itself.

Now should that message have been tagged with [OT] or not?

Sorry, I'm feeling frisky this bright morning.

-- 
Karel Jansens.
Don't send me HTML-based e-mails, my mail program is set up to ignore them.
If you don't know what this means, ask someone or get off the Internet.
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Fieldworker"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "[NTLK] soldering new RAM (MP2kU)"
In reply to: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] "Newton" Talk - what a novel idea!"
Next in thread: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] [?] OT or not OT, that's the question."
Reply: Chip Matteson: "Re: [NTLK] [?] OT or not OT, that's the question."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 10:00:00 PDT