Re: [NTLK] Upgrading a MP2000 (again..)

From: Mark (markr13_at_comcast.net)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 18:00:29 PDT


At one reseller I dealt with, they had a hardware test from Apple that
could distinguish between the ones with and without jaggies. Its unclear
if this was a bad batch or just a random issue.

Mark

-- 
Mark Ross
markr13_at_comcast.net
------------------------------
Need a Screen Protector to keep your Newton in tip top shape?
Go to <http://www.NuShield.com> for NuShield screen protectors.
Don't leave your Newt Naked!
MessagePad 2X00 films now available in clear and antiglare
Phone/Fax/Voicemail: (530) 678-5513 
>Glen Shepherd wrote:
>> isn't the 2100 the most affected by jaggies?
>> The way I am thinking is that It would be safer
>> to stick with a upgraded 2000.
>   I have a 2100 and an upgraded 2000. Both have been used extensively
>(the backlights are getting quite dim) and neither one has the jaggies.
>   I use NuShields on them and carefully clean around the edges of the
>screen each time the shield is changed to make sure debris haven't become
>lodged between the case and the screen.
>   I know there has been speculation that the 2100 is more prone to
>jaggies than the 2100 and that the case has been identified as the
>possible problem. It would be interesting to know if there was a batch of
>2100s that this affected (is there a range of serial numbers that this
>problem affects?)
>
>Peter
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 18:30:01 PDT