Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?

From: Peter Cameron (pdwc_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2003 - 14:47:01 PST

Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Previous message: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
In reply to: Len Cole: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 02/11/03 3:26 PM, Len Cole at leonard.cole_at_verizon.net wrote:
> Simply because someone somewhere is using a quill pen doesn't make the quill
> pen not obsolete.
But, by definition, it would not be obsolete. As long as it is in use
somewhere it is obsolescent. Big difference.

Peter

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Previous message: Brian Pearce: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
In reply to: Len Cole: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 02 2003 - 15:30:01 PST