Re: [NTLK] OT: exemption for obsolete platforms?

From: Brian Pearce (bpearce_at_cloud9.net)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2003 - 17:15:11 PST

Next message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Previous message: Rhonda Hyslop: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN]NotesWordCount (was: word count in notepad?)"
In reply to: Len Cole: "[NTLK] OT: exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> For what it's worth:
>
> Apple's Service Parts Database (assembled around 1 May 2001), list 89
> products as being "obsolete".

I believe Apple's use of the term "obsolete" would be more a reference
to products they support in some way, have parts available for, or
something related to the company's operations than any useful legal
definition.

BRIAN/bpearce_at_cloud9.net

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] US Copyrights: 3 yrs. exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Previous message: Rhonda Hyslop: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN]NotesWordCount (was: word count in notepad?)"
In reply to: Len Cole: "[NTLK] OT: exemption for obsolete platforms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 02 2003 - 18:30:00 PST